Hmmm

The NY Times story on the CIA tapes had this interesting note:

The CIA has said that the Justice Department and other elements of the executive branch reviewed and approved the use of a set of harsh techniques before they were used on any prisoners, and that the Justice Department issued a classified legal opinion in August 2002 that provided explicit authorization for their use.

Since when do Justice Departments issue secret rulings? I thought the whole point of the rule of law, from the Code of Hammurabi on down, is that the laws are public. But I guess that’s pre-9/11 thinking for you.

Tags: , , , , ,

5 Responses to “Hmmm”

  1. Jack Says:

    At first glance I don’t think this is really an “opinion.” Probably more like an internal memo or interpretation.

  2. Peter Says:

    Hey, I’m just working off what the Times called it and I assume they have a reason.

  3. Max Says:

    Probably this classified opinion was issued through a process along these lines:

    CIA: “Hypothetically, if we did X Y Z, would that be illegal?”

    Justice Department: “Yes.”

    CIA: “BTW this conversation never happened.”

    I wouldn’t necessarily call it a slap in the face of the rule of law, but it is very fishy. The intelligence “community” is way out of line on this. Honestly, any excuse to strip away civil liberties…

  4. Max Says:

    And by “Yes,” of course I mean “No.” Though I wish it had gone the other way.

  5. Jack Says:

    The answer is coming.

Leave a Reply