<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trade-offs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peter.beachheadonline.com/blog/2008/03/11/trade-offs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peter.beachheadonline.com/blog/2008/03/11/trade-offs/</link>
	<description>Word is born.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 03:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://peter.beachheadonline.com/blog/2008/03/11/trade-offs/#comment-10381</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 22:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peter.beachheadonline.com/blog/2008/03/11/trade-offs/#comment-10381</guid>
		<description>Bioware, the game developers, are Canadian. Coincidence? I think not!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bioware, the game developers, are Canadian. Coincidence? I think not!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://peter.beachheadonline.com/blog/2008/03/11/trade-offs/#comment-10377</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peter.beachheadonline.com/blog/2008/03/11/trade-offs/#comment-10377</guid>
		<description>Well, Amarnath would have been happier with "because." :-)

I believe the author's point (if there is any point other than to make a joke) is that if you disregarded every modern philosopher associated with some kooky mass movement or another, the canon becomes pretty thin. But this comment thread really ought to be about blue-skinned Canadian space lesbos; anything else honestly isn't in the spirit of the original article.

&lt;a href="http://thedarkknight.warnerbros.com/onesheet.jpg" rel="nofollow"&gt;Why so serious&lt;/a&gt;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Amarnath would have been happier with &#8220;because.&#8221; <img src='http://peter.beachheadonline.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I believe the author&#8217;s point (if there is any point other than to make a joke) is that if you disregarded every modern philosopher associated with some kooky mass movement or another, the canon becomes pretty thin. But this comment thread really ought to be about blue-skinned Canadian space lesbos; anything else honestly isn&#8217;t in the spirit of the original article.</p>
<p><a href="http://thedarkknight.warnerbros.com/onesheet.jpg" rel="nofollow">Why so serious</a>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://peter.beachheadonline.com/blog/2008/03/11/trade-offs/#comment-10376</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peter.beachheadonline.com/blog/2008/03/11/trade-offs/#comment-10376</guid>
		<description>Well, as Max mentions, the whole piece is pretty light-hearted. But yeah...

Oh, an in the question I put forward, that should be &lt;em&gt;even though&lt;/em&gt;, not because.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, as Max mentions, the whole piece is pretty light-hearted. But yeah&#8230;</p>
<p>Oh, an in the question I put forward, that should be <em>even though</em>, not because.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://peter.beachheadonline.com/blog/2008/03/11/trade-offs/#comment-10374</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peter.beachheadonline.com/blog/2008/03/11/trade-offs/#comment-10374</guid>
		<description>i guess i wasn't being very specific about the 'question,' and although i put it in a vague way, you answered what i wanted to know. 

i don't agree with the shrug the author offers, btw - 'you just have to deal with that' - but i agree that a good idea is a good idea, whatever 'good' means here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i guess i wasn&#8217;t being very specific about the &#8216;question,&#8217; and although i put it in a vague way, you answered what i wanted to know. </p>
<p>i don&#8217;t agree with the shrug the author offers, btw - &#8216;you just have to deal with that&#8217; - but i agree that a good idea is a good idea, whatever &#8216;good&#8217; means here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://peter.beachheadonline.com/blog/2008/03/11/trade-offs/#comment-10373</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peter.beachheadonline.com/blog/2008/03/11/trade-offs/#comment-10373</guid>
		<description>Holy shit, that article is HILARIOUS!

"Just to be clear: As Mass Effect's head writer lauds his own work for its subversion of traditional sex roles, we see images of a stripper and a prostitute."

And, "The future can't possibly be as dull as blue Canadian chicks."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy shit, that article is HILARIOUS!</p>
<p>&#8220;Just to be clear: As Mass Effect&#8217;s head writer lauds his own work for its subversion of traditional sex roles, we see images of a stripper and a prostitute.&#8221;</p>
<p>And, &#8220;The future can&#8217;t possibly be as dull as blue Canadian chicks.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://peter.beachheadonline.com/blog/2008/03/11/trade-offs/#comment-10368</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 07:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peter.beachheadonline.com/blog/2008/03/11/trade-offs/#comment-10368</guid>
		<description>To agree with Heidegger's ideas because he also supported the Nazis? I haven't read any of his work, so I couldn't say, though in general I figure a good idea is a good idea, regardless of anything else about the author. But I just posted the quote because I thought it was funny. =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To agree with Heidegger&#8217;s ideas because he also supported the Nazis? I haven&#8217;t read any of his work, so I couldn&#8217;t say, though in general I figure a good idea is a good idea, regardless of anything else about the author. But I just posted the quote because I thought it was funny. =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://peter.beachheadonline.com/blog/2008/03/11/trade-offs/#comment-10364</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 03:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peter.beachheadonline.com/blog/2008/03/11/trade-offs/#comment-10364</guid>
		<description>what do you think about this question, peter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what do you think about this question, peter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
